VT vs VTI: Correlation & Overlap
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) carry a correlation of 0.97, a very strong link. By holdings, the two funds overlap 63.7% by weight.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are VT and VTI?
On 3 years of weekly data the VT/VTI correlation comes out at 0.97, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.96 over 1 year against 0.97 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.97, and annualized covariance runs at 196.5 %².
Few assets follow VT as closely as VTI, which ranks #2 of 136 tracked partners. Their 12-month results are close: +22.7% for VT against +20.7% for VTI. Stability stands out here, with the rolling one-year correlation confined to 0.96 through 0.98.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
VT vs VTI: side by side
| VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) | VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +22.7% | +20.7% |
| 5-year return | +67.7% | +74.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 13.9% | 14.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.92 | 1.01 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -16.5% | -19.3% |
| Dividend yield | 1.59% | 1.06% |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.03% |
| Assets under management | $97.9B | $2,290.0B |
| Sector / category | ETF · Global | ETF · US Large Cap |
VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield. VTI, Vanguard's Large Blend fund, carries $2,290.0B under management, 3140 holdings, a 0.03% expense ratio, a 1.06% trailing dividend yield.
Portfolio overlap between VT and VTI
The two portfolios overlap heavily: 63.7% of the funds' weight sits in the same underlying holdings (1529 common positions). Correlation tells you they move together; overlap tells you why.
| Common holding | Weight in VT | Weight in VTI |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 4.20% | 6.42% |
| AAPL | 4.00% | 6.31% |
| MSFT | 3.09% | 4.80% |
| AMZN | 2.36% | 3.66% |
| GOOGL | 1.89% | 2.91% |
| AVGO | 1.62% | 2.56% |
| GOOG | 1.49% | 2.32% |
| META | 1.10% | 1.70% |
| JPM | 0.84% | 1.31% |
| MU | 0.83% | 1.29% |
| LLY | 0.82% | 1.36% |
| TSLA | 0.81% | 1.22% |
| BRK.B | 0.75% | 1.28% |
| AMD | 0.69% | 1.08% |
| XOM | 0.58% | 0.90% |
Largest positions held only by VT: 2330 (1.61%), 005930 (0.72%), ASML (0.57%), 000660 (0.56%), 700 (0.34%). Only by VTI: APGE (0.01%), SYRE (0.01%), AGX (0.01%), AAOI (0.01%), FIG (0.01%).
Overlap = sum of the smaller of the two weights across common holdings, from issuer disclosures as of 2026-07-31. Top 15 common positions shown.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | VT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -18.0% | -19.5% |
| 2023 | +22.0% | +26.0% |
| 2024 | +16.5% | +23.8% |
| 2025 | +22.4% | +17.1% |
| 2026 | +15.2% | +14.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are VT and VTI good diversifiers for each other?
No: a correlation of 0.97 means VT and VTI tend to fall together, which is precisely when diversification is supposed to help. The 63.7% holdings overlap makes the redundancy concrete: much of it is the same book twice.
FAQ
What is the correlation between VT and VTI?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.97 over 3 years, with 0.96 over the last year and 0.97 over 5 years.
Is VTI a good diversifier for VT?
No: a correlation of 0.97 means VT and VTI tend to fall together, which is precisely when diversification is supposed to help. The 63.7% holdings overlap makes the redundancy concrete: much of it is the same book twice.
How much do VT and VTI overlap?
63.7% by weight, across 1529 common holdings, based on issuer-disclosed portfolios as of 2026-07-31.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vt-vs-vti.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vt-vs-vti/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: VT correlations · VTI correlations
