PairBook
HomeNMAD › NMAD vs SONM

NMAD vs SONM: Correlation

How closely do Nomad Power Solutions, Inc. (NMAD) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.25, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-5363.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are NMAD and SONM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of NMAD and SONM correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.04 versus -0.25 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -5363.5 %².

SONM is close to the least connected end of NMAD's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 14. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with NMAD ahead by 98.4 points (+29.2% versus -69.2%). One caveat on sizing: NMAD is 1.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

NMAD vs SONM: side by side

NMAD (Nomad Power Solutions, Inc.)SONM (DNA X, Inc.)
1-year return+29.2%-69.2%
5-year return-80.2%-99.6%
Volatility (ann.)197.9%106.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.820.06
Max drawdown (3Y)-80.8%-98.5%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: NMAD -80.8% vs -98.5%Higher 5y return: NMAD -80.2% vs -99.6%
-72%0%+66%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). NMAD · SONM

Year-by-year returns

YearNMADSONM
2022-57.1%-53.9%
2023-53.9%+72.9%
2024-13.6%-57.1%
2025+93.6%-94.5%
2026+12.5%+3.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are NMAD and SONM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, NMAD and SONM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between NMAD and SONM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with 0.04 over the last year and -0.09 over 5 years.

Is SONM a good diversifier for NMAD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, NMAD and SONM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/nmad-vs-sonm.json

NMAD vs SONM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25NMAD vs SONM-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![NMAD vs SONM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/nmad-vs-sonm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/nmad-vs-sonm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: NMAD correlations · SONM correlations