PairBook
HomeBTBT › BTBT vs NMAD

BTBT vs NMAD: Correlation

How closely do Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) and Nomad Power Solutions, Inc. (NMAD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.36, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.36
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
6043.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BTBT and NMAD?

Over the past 3 years, BTBT and NMAD moved with a correlation of 0.36, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.35 over 1 year against 0.36 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.23, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 6043.4 %².

Among the 24 assets we track against BTBT, NMAD sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #20. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NMAD outperformed by 71.2 percentage points (-42.0% for BTBT against +29.2% for NMAD). Note the risk asymmetry: NMAD runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BTBT vs NMAD: side by side

BTBT (Bit Digital, Inc.)NMAD (Nomad Power Solutions, Inc.)
1-year return-42.0%+29.2%
5-year return-87.6%-80.2%
Volatility (ann.)85.4%197.9%
Beta vs S&P 5002.240.82
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.1%-80.8%
Market cap$0.6B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BTBT -78.1% vs -80.8%Higher 5y return: NMAD -80.2% vs -87.6%
-48%0%+66%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BTBT · NMAD

Year-by-year returns

YearBTBTNMAD
2022-90.1%-57.1%
2023+605.0%-53.9%
2024-30.7%-13.6%
2025-35.5%+93.6%
2026-15.9%+12.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BTBT and NMAD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.36 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BTBT and NMAD?

The BTBT/NMAD correlation stands at 0.36 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.35, 5 years: 0.23), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NMAD a good diversifier for BTBT?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.36 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.36 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/btbt-vs-nmad.json

BTBT vs NMAD: 3-year weekly correlation 0.36BTBT vs NMAD0.36

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BTBT vs NMAD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/btbt-vs-nmad.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/btbt-vs-nmad/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BTBT correlations · NMAD correlations