PairBook
HomeINMB › INMB vs NMAD

INMB vs NMAD: Correlation

INmune Bio Inc. (INMB) and Nomad Power Solutions, Inc. (NMAD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.31.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.01
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-4744.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are INMB and NMAD?

Over the past 3 years, INMB and NMAD moved with a correlation of -0.31, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.01 versus -0.31 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.17, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -4744.7 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against INMB, NMAD sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Over the last 12 months NMAD came out ahead by 11.8 percentage points (+17.4% against +29.2%). One caveat on sizing: NMAD is 2.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

INMB vs NMAD: side by side

INMB (INmune Bio Inc.)NMAD (Nomad Power Solutions, Inc.)
1-year return+17.4%+29.2%
5-year return-89.4%-80.2%
Volatility (ann.)76.1%197.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.330.82
Max drawdown (3Y)-92.0%-80.8%
Market cap$0.1B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: NMAD -80.8% vs -92.0%Higher 5y return: NMAD -80.2% vs -89.4%
-47%0%+66%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). INMB · NMAD

Year-by-year returns

YearINMBNMAD
2022-37.8%-57.1%
2023+77.6%-53.9%
2024-58.5%-13.6%
2025-66.6%+93.6%
2026+53.8%+12.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are INMB and NMAD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.31 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between INMB and NMAD?

The INMB/NMAD correlation stands at -0.31 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.01, 5 years: -0.17), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NMAD a good diversifier for INMB?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.31 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.31 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/inmb-vs-nmad.json

INMB vs NMAD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31INMB vs NMAD-0.31

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![INMB vs NMAD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/inmb-vs-nmad.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/inmb-vs-nmad/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: INMB correlations · NMAD correlations