PairBook
HomeCHE › CHE vs NMAD

CHE vs NMAD: Correlation

How closely do Chemed Corp (CHE) and Nomad Power Solutions, Inc. (NMAD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.36, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.36
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.08
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.25
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1842.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHE and NMAD?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CHE and NMAD correlate at -0.36, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.08) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.36). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.25, with an annualized covariance of -1842.7 %².

Among the 16 assets we track against CHE, NMAD sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #16. On 12-month performance NMAD holds a 14.3-point edge, +14.9% against +29.2%. One caveat on sizing: NMAD is 7.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHE vs NMAD: side by side

CHE (Chemed Corp)NMAD (Nomad Power Solutions, Inc.)
1-year return+14.9%+29.2%
5-year return+12.2%-80.2%
Volatility (ann.)26.0%197.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.210.82
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.9%-80.8%
Market cap$6.8B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)27.6
Dividend yield0.44%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CHE 0.44% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CHE -42.9% vs -80.8%Higher 5y return: CHE +12.2% vs -80.2%
-47%0%+66%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CHE · NMAD

Year-by-year returns

YearCHENMAD
2022-3.2%-57.1%
2023+14.9%-53.9%
2024-9.1%-13.6%
2025-18.9%+93.6%
2026+22.1%+12.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHE and NMAD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.36 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHE and NMAD?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CHE and NMAD is -0.36 over 3 years, -0.08 over 1 year and -0.25 over 5 years.

Is NMAD a good diversifier for CHE?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.36 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.36 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/che-vs-nmad.json

CHE vs NMAD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.36CHE vs NMAD-0.36

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CHE vs NMAD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/che-vs-nmad.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/che-vs-nmad/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHE correlations · NMAD correlations