PairBook
HomeNMAD › NMAD vs TRIP

NMAD vs TRIP: Correlation

How closely do Nomad Power Solutions, Inc. (NMAD) and TripAdvisor, Inc. (TRIP) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.38, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.38
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.01
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.33
long-run
Ann. covariance
4070.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are NMAD and TRIP?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of NMAD and TRIP correlate at 0.38, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.01) runs below the 3-year figure (0.38). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.33, with an annualized covariance of 4070.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, TRIP places #5 of the 14 assets tracked against NMAD. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NMAD outperformed by 72.0 percentage points (+29.2% for NMAD against -42.8% for TRIP). Risk is not evenly split, since NMAD carries 3.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

NMAD vs TRIP: side by side

NMAD (Nomad Power Solutions, Inc.)TRIP (TripAdvisor, Inc.)
1-year return+29.2%-42.8%
5-year return-80.2%-71.6%
Volatility (ann.)197.9%54.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.821.14
Max drawdown (3Y)-80.8%-67.6%
Market cap$0.1B$1.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: TRIP -67.6% vs -80.8%Higher 5y return: TRIP -71.6% vs -80.2%
-48%0%+66%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). NMAD · TRIP

Year-by-year returns

YearNMADTRIP
2022-57.1%-34.0%
2023-53.9%+19.7%
2024-13.6%-31.4%
2025+93.6%-1.4%
2026+12.5%-32.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are NMAD and TRIP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.38 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between NMAD and TRIP?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between NMAD and TRIP is 0.38 over 3 years, 0.01 over 1 year and 0.33 over 5 years.

Is TRIP a good diversifier for NMAD?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.38 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.38 mean?

A reading of 0.38 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/nmad-vs-trip.json

NMAD vs TRIP: 3-year weekly correlation 0.38NMAD vs TRIP0.38

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![NMAD vs TRIP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/nmad-vs-trip.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/nmad-vs-trip/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: NMAD correlations · TRIP correlations