BSEM vs META: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BioStem Technologies, Inc. (BSEM) and Meta Platforms (META) carry a correlation of 0.36, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BSEM and META?
Over the past 3 years, BSEM and META moved with a correlation of 0.36, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.32 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.16, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1496.6 %².
By 3-year correlation, META places #5 of the 12 assets tracked against BSEM. The last year tells two different stories: META led by 16.4 percentage points, -39.7% for BSEM against -23.3% for META. Note the risk asymmetry: BSEM runs 3.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BSEM vs META: side by side
| BSEM (BioStem Technologies, Inc.) | META (Meta Platforms) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -39.7% | -23.3% |
| 5-year return | +263.2% | +51.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 113.1% | 36.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.65 | 1.45 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -88.0% | -34.2% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $1,454.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | 4.1 | 21.7 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.36% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Communication Services |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BSEM | META |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +187.5% | -64.2% |
| 2023 | +96.0% | +194.1% |
| 2024 | +136.2% | +66.0% |
| 2025 | -72.5% | +13.1% |
| 2026 | +1.0% | -13.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BSEM and META good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.36, BSEM and META keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BSEM and META?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.36 over 3 years, with 0.32 over the last year and 0.16 over 5 years.
Is META a good diversifier for BSEM?
Reasonably. At 0.36, BSEM and META keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.36 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bsem-vs-meta.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bsem-vs-meta/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BSEM correlations · META correlations
