BSEM vs CRVS: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BioStem Technologies, Inc. (BSEM) and Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) carry a correlation of 0.37, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BSEM and CRVS?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BSEM and CRVS correlate at 0.37, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.64) runs above the 3-year figure (0.37). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.21, with an annualized covariance of 6063.1 %².
Few assets follow BSEM as closely as CRVS, which ranks #3 of 12 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: CRVS led by 207.3 percentage points, -39.7% for BSEM against +167.6% for CRVS.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BSEM vs CRVS: side by side
| BSEM (BioStem Technologies, Inc.) | CRVS (Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -39.7% | +167.6% |
| 5-year return | +263.2% | +581.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 113.1% | 144.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.65 | 1.20 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -88.0% | -70.5% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $1.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | 4.1 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BSEM | CRVS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +187.5% | -64.7% |
| 2023 | +96.0% | +107.1% |
| 2024 | +136.2% | +204.0% |
| 2025 | -72.5% | +43.9% |
| 2026 | +1.0% | +91.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BSEM and CRVS good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.37, BSEM and CRVS keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BSEM and CRVS?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BSEM and CRVS is 0.37 over 3 years, 0.64 over 1 year and 0.21 over 5 years.
Is CRVS a good diversifier for BSEM?
Reasonably. At 0.37, BSEM and CRVS keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?
A reading of 0.37 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bsem-vs-crvs.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bsem-vs-crvs/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BSEM correlations · CRVS correlations
