BSEM vs FNGD: Correlation
BioStem Technologies, Inc. (BSEM) and MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BSEM and FNGD?
Over the past 3 years, BSEM and FNGD moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.22 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.09, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2006.3 %².
Out of 12 assets tracked against BSEM, FNGD lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: BSEM led by 16.0 percentage points, -39.7% for BSEM against -55.7% for FNGD.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BSEM vs FNGD: side by side
| BSEM (BioStem Technologies, Inc.) | FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -39.7% | -55.7% |
| 5-year return | +263.2% | -99.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 113.1% | 75.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.65 | -4.54 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -88.0% | -97.6% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 4.1 | 20.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BSEM | FNGD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +187.5% | +52.2% |
| 2023 | +96.0% | -90.1% |
| 2024 | +136.2% | -76.6% |
| 2025 | -72.5% | -61.4% |
| 2026 | +1.0% | -49.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BSEM and FNGD good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BSEM and FNGD?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BSEM and FNGD is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.22 over 1 year and -0.09 over 5 years.
Is FNGD a good diversifier for BSEM?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bsem-vs-fngd.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bsem-vs-fngd/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BSEM correlations · FNGD correlations
