PairBook
HomeBSEM › BSEM vs MACI

BSEM vs MACI: Correlation

BioStem Technologies, Inc. (BSEM) and Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A (MACI) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-57.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BSEM and MACI?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BSEM and MACI correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.38 versus -0.25 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -57.9 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against BSEM, MACI lands near the bottom at #12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MACI outperformed by 44.1 percentage points (-39.7% for BSEM against +4.4% for MACI). Note the risk asymmetry: BSEM runs 53.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BSEM vs MACI: side by side

BSEM (BioStem Technologies, Inc.)MACI (Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A)
1-year return-39.7%+4.4%
5-year return+263.2%n/a
Volatility (ann.)113.1%2.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.65-0.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-88.0%-2.0%
Market cap$0.1B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)4.160.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: BSEM 4.1 vs 60.9Smaller drawdown: MACI -2.0% vs -88.0%
-52%0%+7%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BSEM · MACI

Year-by-year returns

YearBSEMMACI
2022+187.5%
2023+96.0%
2024+136.2%
2025-72.5%+5.7%
2026+1.0%+3.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BSEM and MACI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BSEM and MACI?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BSEM and MACI is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.38 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MACI a good diversifier for BSEM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bsem-vs-maci.json

BSEM vs MACI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25BSEM vs MACI-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BSEM vs MACI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bsem-vs-maci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bsem-vs-maci/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BSEM correlations · MACI correlations