PairBook
HomeSW › SW vs ZCMD

SW vs ZCMD: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Smurfit Westrock (SW) and Zhongchao Inc. - Class A (ZCMD) carry a correlation of -0.15, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.15
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-835.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SW and ZCMD?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of SW and ZCMD correlate at -0.15, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.20 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -835.5 %².

Within SW's tracked universe of 30 assets, ZCMD comes in at #25 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SW outperformed by 109.6 percentage points (+9.7% for SW against -99.9% for ZCMD). Risk is not evenly split, since ZCMD carries 3.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SW vs ZCMD: side by side

SW (Smurfit Westrock)ZCMD (Zhongchao Inc. - Class A)
1-year return+9.7%-99.9%
5-year return+2.6%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)40.1%141.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.920.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-40.5%-100.0%
Market cap$25.5B
P/E (trailing)51.7
Dividend yield3.57%0.00%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Higher yield: SW 3.57% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SW -40.5% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: SW +2.6% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). SW · ZCMD

Year-by-year returns

YearSWZCMD
2022-28.0%-35.4%
2023+14.1%-69.5%
2024+37.6%-53.8%
2025-26.2%-72.2%
2026+29.5%-99.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SW and ZCMD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.15, SW and ZCMD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SW and ZCMD?

The SW/ZCMD correlation stands at -0.15 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.20, 5 years: -0.09), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZCMD a good diversifier for SW?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.15, SW and ZCMD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.15 mean?

A reading of -0.15 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/sw-vs-zcmd.json

SW vs ZCMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.15SW vs ZCMD-0.15

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SW vs ZCMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/sw-vs-zcmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/sw-vs-zcmd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SW correlations · ZCMD correlations