PairBook
HomeSW › SW vs VXZ

SW vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Smurfit Westrock (SW) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.36, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.36
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.38
long-run
Ann. covariance
-370.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SW and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of SW and VXZ correlate at -0.36, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.37 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.38, with an annualized covariance of -370.3 %².

Among the 30 assets we track against SW, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #29. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SW outperformed by 25.8 percentage points (+9.7% for SW against -16.1% for VXZ). Risk is not evenly split, since SW carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SW vs VXZ: side by side

SW (Smurfit Westrock)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+9.7%-16.1%
5-year return+2.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)40.1%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.92-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-40.5%-36.4%
Market cap$25.5B
P/E (trailing)51.7
Dividend yield3.57%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -40.5%Higher 5y return: SW +2.6% vs -53.1%
-28%0%+10%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. SW · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearSWVXZ
2022-28.0%+0.5%
2023+14.1%-44.0%
2024+37.6%-12.7%
2025-26.2%+5.7%
2026+29.5%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SW and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.36, SW and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SW and VXZ?

The SW/VXZ correlation stands at -0.36 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.37, 5 years: -0.38), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for SW?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.36, SW and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.36 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.36 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/sw-vs-vxz.json

SW vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.36SW vs VXZ-0.36

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SW vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/sw-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/sw-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SW correlations · VXZ correlations