PairBook
HomeDZZ › DZZ vs SW

DZZ vs SW: Correlation

How closely do DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DZZ) and Smurfit Westrock (SW) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.16, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-571.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DZZ and SW?

On 3 years of weekly data the DZZ/SW correlation comes out at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.25 over 1 year against -0.16 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -571.5 %².

Within DZZ's tracked universe of 73 assets, SW comes in at #13 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SW ahead by 18.3 points (-8.6% versus +9.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: DZZ runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DZZ vs SW: side by side

DZZ (DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038)SW (Smurfit Westrock)
1-year return-8.6%+9.7%
5-year return-40.0%+2.6%
Volatility (ann.)89.0%40.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.360.92
Max drawdown (3Y)-83.1%-40.5%
Market cap$25.5B
P/E (trailing)51.7
Dividend yield0.00%3.57%
Sector / categoryUS ListedMaterials
Higher yield: SW 3.57% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SW -40.5% vs -83.1%Higher 5y return: SW +2.6% vs -40.0%
-28%0%+254%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DZZ · SW

Year-by-year returns

YearDZZSW
2022+3.0%-28.0%
2023-8.3%+14.1%
2024-35.0%+37.6%
2025+132.7%-26.2%
2026-57.2%+29.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DZZ and SW good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, DZZ and SW have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DZZ and SW?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DZZ and SW is -0.16 over 3 years, -0.25 over 1 year and -0.14 over 5 years.

Is SW a good diversifier for DZZ?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, DZZ and SW have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dzz-vs-sw.json

DZZ vs SW: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16DZZ vs SW-0.16

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![DZZ vs SW correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dzz-vs-sw.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dzz-vs-sw/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DZZ correlations · SW correlations