PairBook
HomeCLB › CLB vs DZZ

CLB vs DZZ: Correlation

How closely do Core Laboratories Inc. (CLB) and DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DZZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.32, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.32
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
1527.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CLB and DZZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the CLB/DZZ correlation comes out at 0.32, moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.51 versus 0.32 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is 0.20, and annualized covariance runs at 1527.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, DZZ places #10 of the 15 assets tracked against CLB. The last year tells two different stories: CLB led by 19.2 percentage points, +10.6% for CLB against -8.6% for DZZ. One caveat on sizing: DZZ is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CLB vs DZZ: side by side

CLB (Core Laboratories Inc.)DZZ (DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038)
1-year return+10.6%-8.6%
5-year return-55.8%-40.0%
Volatility (ann.)53.1%89.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.910.36
Max drawdown (3Y)-62.5%-83.1%
Market cap$0.6B
P/E (trailing)23.2
Dividend yield0.33%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CLB 0.33% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CLB -62.5% vs -83.1%Higher 5y return: DZZ -40.0% vs -55.8%
-18%0%+254%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CLB · DZZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCLBDZZ
2022-9.0%+3.0%
2023-12.7%-8.3%
2024-1.8%-35.0%
2025-7.1%+132.7%
2026-23.2%-57.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CLB and DZZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.32 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CLB and DZZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CLB and DZZ is 0.32 over 3 years, 0.51 over 1 year and 0.20 over 5 years.

Is DZZ a good diversifier for CLB?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.32 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.32 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/clb-vs-dzz.json

CLB vs DZZ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.32CLB vs DZZ0.32

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CLB vs DZZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/clb-vs-dzz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/clb-vs-dzz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CLB correlations · DZZ correlations