DZZ vs VICR: Correlation
DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DZZ) and Vicor Corporation (VICR) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.34.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are DZZ and VICR?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DZZ and VICR correlate at 0.34, moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.45 versus 0.34 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.22, with an annualized covariance of 2167.9 %².
By 3-year correlation, VICR places #4 of the 73 assets tracked against DZZ. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VICR ahead by 305.4 points (-8.6% versus +296.8%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
DZZ vs VICR: side by side
| DZZ (DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038) | VICR (Vicor Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -8.6% | +296.8% |
| 5-year return | -40.0% | +65.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 89.0% | 71.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.36 | 2.00 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -83.1% | -53.9% |
| Market cap | – | $9.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 65.3 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | DZZ | VICR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +3.0% | -57.7% |
| 2023 | -8.3% | -16.4% |
| 2024 | -35.0% | +7.5% |
| 2025 | +132.7% | +126.8% |
| 2026 | -57.2% | +85.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are DZZ and VICR good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.34, DZZ and VICR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between DZZ and VICR?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DZZ and VICR is 0.34 over 3 years, 0.45 over 1 year and 0.22 over 5 years.
Is VICR a good diversifier for DZZ?
Reasonably. At 0.34, DZZ and VICR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.34 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.34 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dzz-vs-vicr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dzz-vs-vicr/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: DZZ correlations · VICR correlations
