RM vs VXZ: Correlation
Regional Management Corp. (RM) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.32.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are RM and VXZ?
On 3 years of weekly data the RM/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.34 over 1 year against -0.32 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.39, and annualized covariance runs at -308.6 %².
VXZ is close to the least connected end of RM's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 13. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -20.1% against -16.1%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
RM vs VXZ: side by side
| RM (Regional Management Corp.) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -20.1% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | -32.6% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 38.2% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.91 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -31.0% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $0.3B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 6.9 | – |
| Dividend yield | 3.68% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | RM | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -49.6% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | -6.6% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +41.5% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +18.1% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | -13.4% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are RM and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.32, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between RM and VXZ?
The RM/VXZ correlation stands at -0.32 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.34, 5 years: -0.39), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for RM?
Yes: at -0.32, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rm-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rm-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: RM correlations · VXZ correlations
