CCB vs RM: Correlation
Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) and Regional Management Corp. (RM) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.59.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CCB and RM?
On 3 years of weekly data the CCB/RM correlation comes out at 0.59, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.69) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.51, and annualized covariance runs at 1030.1 %².
Few assets follow CCB as closely as RM, which ranks #1 of 19 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: RM led by 38.9 percentage points, -59.0% for CCB against -20.1% for RM.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CCB vs RM: side by side
| CCB (Coastal Financial Corporation) | RM (Regional Management Corp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -59.0% | -20.1% |
| 5-year return | +59.4% | -32.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 45.4% | 38.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.96 | 0.91 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -66.5% | -31.0% |
| Market cap | $0.7B | $0.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 6.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.68% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CCB | RM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -6.1% | -49.6% |
| 2023 | -6.5% | -6.6% |
| 2024 | +91.2% | +41.5% |
| 2025 | +35.0% | +18.1% |
| 2026 | -59.2% | -13.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CCB and RM good diversifiers for each other?
To a limited degree. At 0.59 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CCB and RM?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CCB and RM is 0.59 over 3 years, 0.69 over 1 year and 0.51 over 5 years.
Is RM a good diversifier for CCB?
To a limited degree. At 0.59 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
What does a correlation of 0.59 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ccb-vs-rm.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ccb-vs-rm/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CCB correlations · RM correlations
