PairBook
HomeRM › RM vs TOP

RM vs TOP: Correlation

How closely do Regional Management Corp. (RM) and TOP Financial Group Limited - Class A (TOP) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.29, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.52
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2565.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RM and TOP?

On 3 years of weekly data the RM/TOP correlation comes out at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.52) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.29). The 5-year figure is -0.07, and annualized covariance runs at -2565.0 %².

TOP is close to the least connected end of RM's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 13. The last year tells two different stories: TOP led by 1238.0 percentage points, -20.1% for RM against +1217.9% for TOP. One caveat on sizing: TOP is 6.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RM vs TOP: side by side

RM (Regional Management Corp.)TOP (TOP Financial Group Limited - Class A)
1-year return-20.1%+1217.9%
5-year return-32.6%-9.2%
Volatility (ann.)38.2%230.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.911.60
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.0%-89.6%
Market cap$0.3B$1.9B
P/E (trailing)6.9
Dividend yield3.68%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: RM 3.68% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RM -31.0% vs -89.6%Higher 5y return: TOP -9.2% vs -32.6%
-35%0%+1241%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). RM · TOP

Year-by-year returns

YearRMTOP
2022-49.6%
2023-6.6%-22.5%
2024+41.5%-59.5%
2025+18.1%-34.3%
2026-13.4%+1434.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RM and TOP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RM and TOP?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.29 over 3 years, with -0.52 over the last year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is TOP a good diversifier for RM?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.29 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rm-vs-top.json

RM vs TOP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29RM vs TOP-0.29

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![RM vs TOP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rm-vs-top.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rm-vs-top/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RM correlations · TOP correlations