BANF vs RM: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) and Regional Management Corp. (RM) carry a correlation of 0.53, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BANF and RM?
On 3 years of weekly data the BANF/RM correlation comes out at 0.53, moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.40) than the 3-year average (0.53). The 5-year figure is 0.40, and annualized covariance runs at 572.4 %².
By 3-year correlation, RM places #6 of the 16 assets tracked against BANF. Their 12-month results are close: -16.1% for BANF against -20.1% for RM.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BANF vs RM: side by side
| BANF (BancFirst Corporation) | RM (Regional Management Corp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -16.1% | -20.1% |
| 5-year return | +116.0% | -32.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 28.2% | 38.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.72 | 0.91 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -23.6% | -31.0% |
| Market cap | $3.7B | $0.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | 14.9 | 6.9 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 3.68% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BANF | RM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +27.1% | -49.6% |
| 2023 | +12.4% | -6.6% |
| 2024 | +22.6% | +41.5% |
| 2025 | -8.0% | +18.1% |
| 2026 | +5.1% | -13.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BANF and RM good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.53 means BANF and RM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BANF and RM?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BANF and RM is 0.53 over 3 years, 0.40 over 1 year and 0.40 over 5 years.
Is RM a good diversifier for BANF?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.53 means BANF and RM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.53 mean?
A reading of 0.53 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/banf-vs-rm.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/banf-vs-rm/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BANF correlations · RM correlations
