PairBook
HomeNSC › NSC vs SER

NSC vs SER: Correlation

Norfolk Southern (NSC) and Serina Therapeutics, Inc. (SER) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-368.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are NSC and SER?

Over the past 3 years, NSC and SER moved with a correlation of -0.17, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.22) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.05, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -368.9 %².

Among the 32 assets we track against NSC, SER ranks #27 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: NSC led by 79.5 percentage points, +30.0% for NSC against -49.5% for SER. Note the risk asymmetry: SER runs 4.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

NSC vs SER: side by side

NSC (Norfolk Southern)SER (Serina Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return+30.0%-49.5%
5-year return+49.6%-93.1%
Volatility (ann.)22.0%98.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.69-0.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.1%-95.5%
Market cap$78.1B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)30.1
Dividend yield1.53%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Higher yield: NSC 1.53% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: NSC -25.1% vs -95.5%Higher 5y return: NSC +49.6% vs -93.1%
-70%0%+28%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. NSC · SER

Year-by-year returns

YearNSCSER
2022-15.6%-49.4%
2023-1.6%-30.3%
2024+1.6%-63.6%
2025+25.6%-61.8%
2026+22.0%+31.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are NSC and SER good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between NSC and SER?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between NSC and SER is -0.17 over 3 years, -0.22 over 1 year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is SER a good diversifier for NSC?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/nsc-vs-ser.json

NSC vs SER: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17NSC vs SER-0.17

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![NSC vs SER correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/nsc-vs-ser.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/nsc-vs-ser/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: NSC correlations · SER correlations