MBC vs VXZ: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.39, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MBC and VXZ?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MBC and VXZ correlate at -0.39, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.48 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.38, with an annualized covariance of -431.1 %².
VXZ is close to the least connected end of MBC's tracked universe, ranking #19 of 19. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VXZ ahead by 17.7 points (-33.8% versus -16.1%). One caveat on sizing: MBC is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MBC vs VXZ: side by side
| MBC (MasterBrand, Inc.) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -33.8% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | n/a | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 43.7% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.16 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -64.7% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $1.8B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MBC | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | +0.5% |
| 2023 | +96.7% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | -1.6% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | -24.4% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | -21.6% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MBC and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.39 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MBC and VXZ?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MBC and VXZ is -0.39 over 3 years, -0.48 over 1 year and -0.38 over 5 years.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for MBC?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.39 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.39 mean?
A reading of -0.39 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mbc-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mbc-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MBC correlations · VXZ correlations
