PairBook
HomeASST › ASST vs MBC

ASST vs MBC: Correlation

How closely do Strive, Inc. (ASST) and MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.26, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-8187.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ASST and MBC?

On 3 years of weekly data the ASST/MBC correlation comes out at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.03 versus -0.26 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -8187.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, MBC places #36 of the 58 assets tracked against ASST. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MBC outperformed by 46.6 percentage points (-80.4% for ASST against -33.8% for MBC). Note the risk asymmetry: ASST runs 16.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ASST vs MBC: side by side

ASST (Strive, Inc.)MBC (MasterBrand, Inc.)
1-year return-80.4%-33.8%
5-year returnn/an/a
Volatility (ann.)723.1%43.7%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.011.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.2%-64.7%
Market cap$2.1B$1.8B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MBC -64.7% vs -97.2%
-91%0%+87%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ASST · MBC

Year-by-year returns

YearASSTMBC
2023+96.7%
2024-84.6%-1.6%
2025+50.3%-24.4%
2026+56.6%-21.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ASST and MBC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ASST and MBC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ASST and MBC is -0.26 over 3 years, 0.03 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MBC a good diversifier for ASST?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/asst-vs-mbc.json

ASST vs MBC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26ASST vs MBC-0.26

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ASST vs MBC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/asst-vs-mbc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/asst-vs-mbc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ASST correlations · MBC correlations