MAS vs MBC: Correlation
How closely do Masco (MAS) and MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.67, which is strong.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MAS and MBC?
Over the past 3 years, MAS and MBC moved with a correlation of 0.67, which is strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.67 over 1 year against 0.67 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.62, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 873.1 %².
Within MAS's tracked universe of 61 assets, MBC comes in at #21 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MAS ahead by 33.3 points (-0.5% versus -33.8%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MAS vs MBC: side by side
| MAS (Masco) | MBC (MasterBrand, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -0.5% | -33.8% |
| 5-year return | +29.1% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 29.6% | 43.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.95 | 1.16 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -30.9% | -64.7% |
| Market cap | $14.4B | $1.8B |
| P/E (trailing) | 17.0 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Industrials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MAS | MBC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -32.1% | – |
| 2023 | +46.6% | +96.7% |
| 2024 | +10.0% | -1.6% |
| 2025 | -10.9% | -24.4% |
| 2026 | +16.3% | -21.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MAS and MBC good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.67 means MAS and MBC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MAS and MBC?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MAS and MBC is 0.67 over 3 years, 0.67 over 1 year and 0.62 over 5 years.
Is MBC a good diversifier for MAS?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.67 means MAS and MBC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.67 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.67 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mas-vs-mbc.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mas-vs-mbc/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MAS correlations · MBC correlations
