PairBook
HomeBCC › BCC vs MBC

BCC vs MBC: Correlation

Boise Cascade, L.L.C. (BCC) and MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.71.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.71
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.76
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.68
long-run
Ann. covariance
1136.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BCC and MBC?

On 3 years of weekly data the BCC/MBC correlation comes out at 0.71, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.76) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.68, and annualized covariance runs at 1136.8 %².

Within BCC's tracked universe of 24 assets, MBC comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: BCC led by 24.3 percentage points, -9.5% for BCC against -33.8% for MBC.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BCC vs MBC: side by side

BCC (Boise Cascade, L.L.C.)MBC (MasterBrand, Inc.)
1-year return-9.5%-33.8%
5-year return+71.4%n/a
Volatility (ann.)36.4%43.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.991.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.5%-64.7%
Market cap$2.7B$1.8B
P/E (trailing)27.1
Dividend yield1.10%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: BCC 1.10% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BCC -56.5% vs -64.7%
-48%0%+1%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BCC · MBC

Year-by-year returns

YearBCCMBC
2022+1.5%
2023+106.6%+96.7%
2024-4.0%-1.6%
2025-37.5%-24.4%
2026+7.7%-21.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BCC and MBC good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.71 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BCC and MBC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.71 over 3 years, with 0.76 over the last year and 0.68 over 5 years.

Is MBC a good diversifier for BCC?

To a limited degree. At 0.71 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.71 mean?

A reading of 0.71 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bcc-vs-mbc.json

BCC vs MBC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.71BCC vs MBC0.71

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BCC vs MBC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bcc-vs-mbc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bcc-vs-mbc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BCC correlations · MBC correlations