LRHC vs SPY: Correlation
La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.17.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LRHC and SPY?
Over the past 3 years, LRHC and SPY moved with a correlation of 0.17, which is weak. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.12 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 335.5 %².
Among the 10 assets we track against LRHC, SPY sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #6. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SPY ahead by 120.5 points (-99.9% versus +20.6%). Note the risk asymmetry: LRHC runs 9.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LRHC vs SPY: side by side
| LRHC (La Rosa Holdings Corp.) | SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -99.9% | +20.6% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +82.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 136.9% | 14.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.61 | 1.00 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -100.0% | -18.8% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.09% |
| Assets under management | – | $795.3B |
| Sector / category | US Listed | ETF · US Large Cap |
SPY is a Large Blend fund from State Street Investment Management: $795.3B under management, 504 holdings, a 0.09% expense ratio, a 1.01% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LRHC | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -18.2% |
| 2023 | – | +26.2% |
| 2024 | -43.7% | +24.9% |
| 2025 | -99.1% | +17.7% |
| 2026 | -99.3% | +13.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LRHC and SPY good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at 0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LRHC and SPY?
The LRHC/SPY correlation stands at 0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.12, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is SPY a good diversifier for LRHC?
Yes: at 0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of 0.17 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lrhc-vs-spy.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lrhc-vs-spy/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LRHC correlations · SPY correlations
