PairBook
HomeLRHC › LRHC vs MNPR

LRHC vs MNPR: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) and Monopar Therapeutics Inc. (MNPR) carry a correlation of 0.41, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.41
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
12689.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LRHC and MNPR?

Over the past 3 years, LRHC and MNPR moved with a correlation of 0.41, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.29) runs below the 3-year figure (0.41). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 12689.9 %².

MNPR is one of the assets that tracks LRHC most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 10 assets we track against LRHC. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MNPR ahead by 327.2 points (-99.9% versus +227.3%). One caveat on sizing: MNPR is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LRHC vs MNPR: side by side

LRHC (La Rosa Holdings Corp.)MNPR (Monopar Therapeutics Inc.)
1-year return-99.9%+227.3%
5-year returnn/a+365.1%
Volatility (ann.)136.9%225.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.611.74
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-67.3%
Market cap$0.8B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MNPR -67.3% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+170%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LRHC · MNPR

Year-by-year returns

YearLRHCMNPR
2022-26.2%
2023-85.7%
2024-43.7%+1194.1%
2025-99.1%+196.8%
2026-99.3%+74.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LRHC and MNPR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.41 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LRHC and MNPR?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LRHC and MNPR is 0.41 over 3 years, 0.29 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MNPR a good diversifier for LRHC?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.41 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.41 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lrhc-vs-mnpr.json

LRHC vs MNPR: 3-year weekly correlation 0.41LRHC vs MNPR0.41

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LRHC vs MNPR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lrhc-vs-mnpr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lrhc-vs-mnpr/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LRHC correlations · MNPR correlations