PairBook
HomeELF › ELF vs LRHC

ELF vs LRHC: Correlation

How closely do e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.29, which is weak.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.29
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
2716.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ELF and LRHC?

Over the past 3 years, ELF and LRHC moved with a correlation of 0.29, which is weak. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.29) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 2716.0 %².

Among the 14 assets we track against ELF, LRHC ranks #9 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ELF outperformed by 84.9 percentage points (-15.0% for ELF against -99.9% for LRHC). Note the risk asymmetry: LRHC runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ELF vs LRHC: side by side

ELF (e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.)LRHC (La Rosa Holdings Corp.)
1-year return-15.0%-99.9%
5-year return+244.4%n/a
Volatility (ann.)67.7%136.9%
Beta vs S&P 5002.001.61
Max drawdown (3Y)-77.3%-100.0%
Market cap$6.3B
P/E (trailing)108.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ELF -77.3% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+35%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ELF · LRHC

Year-by-year returns

YearELFLRHC
2022+66.5%
2023+161.0%
2024-13.0%-43.7%
2025-39.4%-99.1%
2026+39.6%-99.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ELF and LRHC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.29 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ELF and LRHC?

The ELF/LRHC correlation stands at 0.29 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.29, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LRHC a good diversifier for ELF?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.29 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.29 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/elf-vs-lrhc.json

ELF vs LRHC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.29ELF vs LRHC0.29

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ELF vs LRHC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/elf-vs-lrhc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/elf-vs-lrhc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ELF correlations · LRHC correlations