BELFB vs LRHC: Correlation
How closely do Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BELFB and LRHC?
On 3 years of weekly data the BELFB/LRHC correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.15) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -1516.7 %².
LRHC is close to the least connected end of BELFB's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 14. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BELFB ahead by 183.6 points (+83.7% versus -99.9%). One caveat on sizing: LRHC is 2.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BELFB vs LRHC: side by side
| BELFB (Bel Fuse Inc.) | LRHC (La Rosa Holdings Corp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +83.7% | -99.9% |
| 5-year return | +1827.0% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 49.1% | 136.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.30 | 1.61 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -33.4% | -100.0% |
| Market cap | $3.7B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 65.2 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.09% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BELFB | LRHC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +158.7% | – |
| 2023 | +104.2% | – |
| 2024 | +24.0% | -43.7% |
| 2025 | +106.3% | -99.1% |
| 2026 | +52.0% | -99.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BELFB and LRHC good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, BELFB and LRHC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BELFB and LRHC?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.15 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is LRHC a good diversifier for BELFB?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, BELFB and LRHC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?
A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/belfb-vs-lrhc.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/belfb-vs-lrhc/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BELFB correlations · LRHC correlations
