LCUT vs SONM: Correlation
How closely do Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LCUT and SONM?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LCUT and SONM correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.32) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.19). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -1313.8 %².
SONM is close to the least connected end of LCUT's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LCUT ahead by 208.7 points (+139.5% versus -69.2%). One caveat on sizing: SONM is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LCUT vs SONM: side by side
| LCUT (Lifetime Brands, Inc.) | SONM (DNA X, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +139.5% | -69.2% |
| 5-year return | -41.8% | -99.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 64.8% | 106.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.81 | 0.06 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -73.3% | -98.5% |
| Market cap | $0.2B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 6.3 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LCUT | SONM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -51.8% | -53.9% |
| 2023 | -8.9% | +72.9% |
| 2024 | -9.9% | -57.1% |
| 2025 | -30.3% | -94.5% |
| 2026 | +138.9% | +3.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LCUT and SONM good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LCUT and SONM?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.32 over the last year and -0.09 over 5 years.
Is SONM a good diversifier for LCUT?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lcut-vs-sonm.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lcut-vs-sonm/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LCUT correlations · SONM correlations
