LCUT vs ULH: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. (ULH) carry a correlation of 0.39, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LCUT and ULH?
Over the past 3 years, LCUT and ULH moved with a correlation of 0.39, which is moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.36) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.33, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1730.5 %².
ULH is one of the assets that tracks LCUT most closely: it ranks #2 out of the 10 assets we track against LCUT. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LCUT outperformed by 165.5 percentage points (+139.5% for LCUT against -26.0% for ULH).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LCUT vs ULH: side by side
| LCUT (Lifetime Brands, Inc.) | ULH (Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +139.5% | -26.0% |
| 5-year return | -41.8% | -5.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 64.8% | 68.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.81 | 1.46 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -73.3% | -76.1% |
| Market cap | $0.2B | $0.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | 6.3 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 2.19% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LCUT | ULH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -51.8% | +79.9% |
| 2023 | -8.9% | -14.9% |
| 2024 | -9.9% | +65.6% |
| 2025 | -30.3% | -66.3% |
| 2026 | +138.9% | +26.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LCUT and ULH good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LCUT and ULH?
The LCUT/ULH correlation stands at 0.39 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.36, 5 years: 0.33), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is ULH a good diversifier for LCUT?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lcut-vs-ulh.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lcut-vs-ulh/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LCUT correlations · ULH correlations
