PairBook
HomeCVLG › CVLG vs LCUT

CVLG vs LCUT: Correlation

How closely do Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. (CVLG) and Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.35, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.35
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.29
long-run
Ann. covariance
846.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CVLG and LCUT?

Over the past 3 years, CVLG and LCUT moved with a correlation of 0.35, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.22) runs below the 3-year figure (0.35). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.29, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 846.5 %².

LCUT is close to the least connected end of CVLG's tracked universe, ranking #14 of 18. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LCUT ahead by 92.4 points (+47.1% versus +139.5%). Risk is not evenly split, since LCUT carries 1.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CVLG vs LCUT: side by side

CVLG (Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.)LCUT (Lifetime Brands, Inc.)
1-year return+47.1%+139.5%
5-year return+200.1%-41.8%
Volatility (ann.)37.9%64.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.020.81
Max drawdown (3Y)-41.3%-73.3%
Market cap$0.9B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)710.66.3
Dividend yield0.79%1.86%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: LCUT 6.3 vs 710.6Higher yield: LCUT 1.86% vs 0.79%Smaller drawdown: CVLG -41.3% vs -73.3%Higher 5y return: CVLG +200.1% vs -41.8%
-28%0%+138%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CVLG · LCUT

Year-by-year returns

YearCVLGLCUT
2022+32.2%-51.8%
2023+34.6%-8.9%
2024+19.4%-9.9%
2025-18.2%-30.3%
2026+61.9%+138.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CVLG and LCUT good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.35, CVLG and LCUT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CVLG and LCUT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.35 over 3 years, with 0.22 over the last year and 0.29 over 5 years.

Is LCUT a good diversifier for CVLG?

Reasonably. At 0.35, CVLG and LCUT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.35 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cvlg-vs-lcut.json

CVLG vs LCUT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.35CVLG vs LCUT0.35

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CVLG vs LCUT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cvlg-vs-lcut.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cvlg-vs-lcut/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CVLG correlations · LCUT correlations