BRFH vs SONM: Correlation
How closely do Barfresh Food Group Inc. (BRFH) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.35, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BRFH and SONM?
Over the past 3 years, BRFH and SONM moved with a correlation of 0.35, which is moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.13 versus 0.35 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.22, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 3762.3 %².
Few assets follow BRFH as closely as SONM, which ranks #2 of 12 tracked partners. Over the last 12 months BRFH came out ahead by 8.6 percentage points (-60.6% against -69.2%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BRFH vs SONM: side by side
| BRFH (Barfresh Food Group Inc.) | SONM (DNA X, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -60.6% | -69.2% |
| 5-year return | -78.8% | -99.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 101.1% | 106.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.79 | 0.06 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -72.9% | -98.5% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BRFH | SONM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -80.2% | -53.9% |
| 2023 | +22.3% | +72.9% |
| 2024 | +84.9% | -57.1% |
| 2025 | -0.3% | -94.5% |
| 2026 | -56.7% | +3.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BRFH and SONM good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.35, BRFH and SONM keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BRFH and SONM?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BRFH and SONM is 0.35 over 3 years, 0.13 over 1 year and 0.22 over 5 years.
Is SONM a good diversifier for BRFH?
Reasonably. At 0.35, BRFH and SONM keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.35 mean?
A reading of 0.35 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/brfh-vs-sonm.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/brfh-vs-sonm/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BRFH correlations · SONM correlations
