PairBook
HomeLCII › LCII vs UHS

LCII vs UHS: Correlation

LCI Industries (LCII) and Universal Health Services (UHS) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.44.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.44
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.42
long-run
Ann. covariance
466.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LCII and UHS?

On 3 years of weekly data the LCII/UHS correlation comes out at 0.44, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.38 over 1 year against 0.44 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.42, and annualized covariance runs at 466.1 %².

Within LCII's tracked universe of 11 assets, UHS comes in at #6 by 3-year correlation. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -0.3% against -5.0%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LCII vs UHS: side by side

LCII (LCI Industries)UHS (Universal Health Services)
1-year return-0.3%-5.0%
5-year return-12.8%+13.5%
Volatility (ann.)34.4%31.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.950.60
Max drawdown (3Y)-41.8%-42.0%
Market cap$2.5B$10.2B
P/E (trailing)11.97.3
Dividend yield4.47%0.45%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Lower P/E: UHS 7.3 vs 11.9Higher yield: LCII 4.47% vs 0.45%Smaller drawdown: LCII -41.8% vs -42.0%Higher 5y return: UHS +13.5% vs -12.8%
-26%0%+50%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LCII · UHS

Year-by-year returns

YearLCIIUHS
2022-38.5%+9.4%
2023+41.1%+8.8%
2024-14.6%+18.2%
2025+22.8%+22.0%
2026-13.1%-20.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LCII and UHS good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.44, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LCII and UHS?

The LCII/UHS correlation stands at 0.44 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.38, 5 years: 0.42), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is UHS a good diversifier for LCII?

A fair diversifier. At 0.44, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lcii-vs-uhs.json

LCII vs UHS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.44LCII vs UHS0.44

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LCII vs UHS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lcii-vs-uhs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lcii-vs-uhs/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LCII correlations · UHS correlations