PairBook
HomeLANV › LANV vs LCII

LANV vs LCII: Correlation

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) and LCI Industries (LCII) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.17
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-471.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LANV and LCII?

On 3 years of weekly data the LANV/LCII correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.17 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -471.4 %².

Within LANV's tracked universe of 52 assets, LCII comes in at #30 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LCII outperformed by 50.2 percentage points (-50.5% for LANV against -0.3% for LCII). Note the risk asymmetry: LANV runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LANV vs LCII: side by side

LANV (Lanvin Group Holdings Limited)LCII (LCI Industries)
1-year return-50.5%-0.3%
5-year return-89.7%-12.8%
Volatility (ann.)69.7%34.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.150.95
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.6%-41.8%
Market cap$0.1B$2.5B
P/E (trailing)11.9
Dividend yield0.00%4.47%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: LCII 4.47% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LCII -41.8% vs -78.6%Higher 5y return: LCII -12.8% vs -89.7%
-57%0%+50%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LANV · LCII

Year-by-year returns

YearLANVLCII
2022-6.1%-38.5%
2023-67.7%+41.1%
2024-31.9%-14.6%
2025+0.0%+22.8%
2026-50.2%-13.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LANV and LCII good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LANV and LCII?

The LANV/LCII correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.17, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LCII a good diversifier for LANV?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lanv-vs-lcii.json

LANV vs LCII: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20LANV vs LCII-0.20

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LANV vs LCII correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lanv-vs-lcii.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lanv-vs-lcii/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LANV correlations · LCII correlations