CING vs LANV: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cingulate Inc. (CING) and Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) carry a correlation of 0.33, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CING and LANV?
Over the past 3 years, CING and LANV moved with a correlation of 0.33, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.26 over 1 year against 0.33 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.21, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 9416.7 %².
Among the 14 assets we track against CING, LANV ranks #7 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CING outperformed by 80.6 percentage points (+30.1% for CING against -50.5% for LANV). Risk is not evenly split, since CING carries 5.8 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CING vs LANV: side by side
| CING (Cingulate Inc.) | LANV (Lanvin Group Holdings Limited) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.1% | -50.5% |
| 5-year return | -99.5% | -89.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 405.7% | 69.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 3.94 | -0.15 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.0% | -78.6% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CING | LANV |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -63.8% | -6.1% |
| 2023 | -61.7% | -67.7% |
| 2024 | -94.6% | -31.9% |
| 2025 | -12.0% | +0.0% |
| 2026 | +25.3% | -50.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CING and LANV good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.33, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CING and LANV?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CING and LANV is 0.33 over 3 years, 0.26 over 1 year and 0.21 over 5 years.
Is LANV a good diversifier for CING?
A fair diversifier. At 0.33, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.33 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.33 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cing-vs-lanv.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cing-vs-lanv/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CING correlations · LANV correlations
