PairBook
HomeCING › CING vs PSNL

CING vs PSNL: Correlation

Cingulate Inc. (CING) and Personalis, Inc. (PSNL) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.40.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.40
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
-0.15
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
21431.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CING and PSNL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CING and PSNL correlate at 0.40, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.15 versus 0.40 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.35, with an annualized covariance of 21431.1 %².

Among the 14 assets we track against CING, PSNL ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PSNL outperformed by 221.4 percentage points (+30.1% for CING against +251.5% for PSNL). Note the risk asymmetry: CING runs 3.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CING vs PSNL: side by side

CING (Cingulate Inc.)PSNL (Personalis, Inc.)
1-year return+30.1%+251.5%
5-year return-99.5%-19.1%
Volatility (ann.)405.7%130.7%
Beta vs S&P 5003.941.14
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.0%-55.2%
Market cap$0.1B$1.8B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: PSNL -55.2% vs -99.0%Higher 5y return: PSNL -19.1% vs -99.5%
-10%0%+251%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CING · PSNL

Year-by-year returns

YearCINGPSNL
2022-63.8%-86.1%
2023-61.7%+6.1%
2024-94.6%+175.2%
2025-12.0%+37.7%
2026+25.3%+111.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CING and PSNL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.40 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CING and PSNL?

The CING/PSNL correlation stands at 0.40 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.15, 5 years: 0.35), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PSNL a good diversifier for CING?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.40 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?

A reading of 0.40 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cing-vs-psnl.json

CING vs PSNL: 3-year weekly correlation 0.40CING vs PSNL0.40

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CING vs PSNL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cing-vs-psnl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cing-vs-psnl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CING correlations · PSNL correlations