PairBook
HomeCING › CING vs RSKD

CING vs RSKD: Correlation

How closely do Cingulate Inc. (CING) and Riskified Ltd. Class A (RSKD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.28, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-4307.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CING and RSKD?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CING and RSKD correlate at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.20 over 1 year against -0.28 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.15, with an annualized covariance of -4307.8 %².

Among the 14 assets we track against CING, RSKD sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #12. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +30.1% against +31.6%. Note the risk asymmetry: CING runs 10.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CING vs RSKD: side by side

CING (Cingulate Inc.)RSKD (Riskified Ltd. Class A)
1-year return+30.1%+31.6%
5-year return-99.5%-81.3%
Volatility (ann.)405.7%38.0%
Beta vs S&P 5003.941.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.0%-42.2%
Market cap$0.1B$0.8B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RSKD -42.2% vs -99.0%Higher 5y return: RSKD -81.3% vs -99.5%
-18%0%+123%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CING · RSKD

Year-by-year returns

YearCINGRSKD
2022-63.8%-41.2%
2023-61.7%+1.3%
2024-94.6%+1.1%
2025-12.0%+5.1%
2026+25.3%+23.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CING and RSKD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CING and RSKD?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.28 over 3 years, with -0.20 over the last year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is RSKD a good diversifier for CING?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cing-vs-rskd.json

CING vs RSKD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28CING vs RSKD-0.28

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CING vs RSKD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cing-vs-rskd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cing-vs-rskd/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CING correlations · RSKD correlations