CING vs SBUX: Correlation
Cingulate Inc. (CING) and Starbucks (SBUX) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.42.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CING and SBUX?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CING and SBUX correlate at 0.42, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.13) runs below the 3-year figure (0.42). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.36, with an annualized covariance of 5837.4 %².
Within CING's tracked universe of 14 assets, SBUX comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +30.1% against +25.5%. Risk is not evenly split, since CING carries 11.9 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CING vs SBUX: side by side
| CING (Cingulate Inc.) | SBUX (Starbucks) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.1% | +25.5% |
| 5-year return | -99.5% | +4.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 405.7% | 34.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 3.94 | 1.10 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.0% | -32.0% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $122.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 62.7 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.29% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Consumer Discretionary |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CING | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -63.8% | -13.2% |
| 2023 | -61.7% | -1.2% |
| 2024 | -94.6% | -2.5% |
| 2025 | -12.0% | -5.3% |
| 2026 | +25.3% | +29.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CING and SBUX good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.42, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CING and SBUX?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CING and SBUX is 0.42 over 3 years, 0.13 over 1 year and 0.36 over 5 years.
Is SBUX a good diversifier for CING?
A fair diversifier. At 0.42, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.42 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.42 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cing-vs-sbux.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cing-vs-sbux/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CING correlations · SBUX correlations
