PairBook
HomeLCII › LCII vs PATK

LCII vs PATK: Correlation

How closely do LCI Industries (LCII) and Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.69, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.69
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.62
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.72
long-run
Ann. covariance
845.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LCII and PATK?

Over the past 3 years, LCII and PATK moved with a correlation of 0.69, which is strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.62 over 1 year against 0.69 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.72, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 845.9 %².

PATK is one of the assets that tracks LCII most closely: it ranks #2 out of the 11 assets we track against LCII. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LCII outperformed by 25.5 percentage points (-0.3% for LCII against -25.8% for PATK).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LCII vs PATK: side by side

LCII (LCI Industries)PATK (Patrick Industries, Inc.)
1-year return-0.3%-25.8%
5-year return-12.8%+62.2%
Volatility (ann.)34.4%35.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.951.04
Max drawdown (3Y)-41.8%-42.9%
Market cap$2.5B$2.7B
P/E (trailing)11.919.9
Dividend yield4.47%2.16%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: LCII 11.9 vs 19.9Higher yield: LCII 4.47% vs 2.16%Smaller drawdown: LCII -41.8% vs -42.9%Higher 5y return: PATK +62.2% vs -12.8%
-26%0%+50%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LCII · PATK

Year-by-year returns

YearLCIIPATK
2022-38.5%-23.1%
2023+41.1%+69.6%
2024-14.6%+26.5%
2025+22.8%+32.7%
2026-13.1%-22.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LCII and PATK good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.69 means LCII and PATK share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LCII and PATK?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LCII and PATK is 0.69 over 3 years, 0.62 over 1 year and 0.72 over 5 years.

Is PATK a good diversifier for LCII?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.69 means LCII and PATK share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lcii-vs-patk.json

LCII vs PATK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.69LCII vs PATK0.69

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LCII vs PATK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lcii-vs-patk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lcii-vs-patk/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LCII correlations · PATK correlations