INTS vs RECT: Correlation
Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) and Rectitude Holdings Ltd (RECT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are INTS and RECT?
Over the past 3 years, INTS and RECT moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.38) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.26). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2919.0 %².
Among the 28 assets we track against INTS, RECT ranks #21 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: INTS led by 28.7 percentage points, -43.4% for INTS against -72.1% for RECT. One caveat on sizing: INTS is 2.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
INTS vs RECT: side by side
| INTS (Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.) | RECT (Rectitude Holdings Ltd) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -43.4% | -72.1% |
| 5-year return | n/a | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 173.1% | 65.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.52 | 0.67 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.5% | -85.4% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 6.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | INTS | RECT |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -79.5% | – |
| 2025 | -76.7% | -74.1% |
| 2026 | -58.3% | -27.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are INTS and RECT good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between INTS and RECT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.26 over 3 years, with -0.38 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is RECT a good diversifier for INTS?
Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?
A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ints-vs-rect.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ints-vs-rect/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: INTS correlations · RECT correlations
