BMA vs INTS: Correlation
How closely do Banco Macro S.A. ADR (representing Ten Class B (BMA) and Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.31, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BMA and INTS?
Over the past 3 years, BMA and INTS moved with a correlation of 0.31, which is moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.61 versus 0.31 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 3710.6 %².
By 3-year correlation, INTS places #8 of the 16 assets tracked against BMA. The last year tells two different stories: BMA led by 82.5 percentage points, +39.1% for BMA against -43.4% for INTS. Risk is not evenly split, since INTS carries 2.5 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BMA vs INTS: side by side
| BMA (Banco Macro S.A. ADR (representing Ten Class B) | INTS (Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +39.1% | -43.4% |
| 5-year return | +460.4% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 68.3% | 173.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.06 | 0.52 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -65.9% | -98.5% |
| Market cap | $4.9B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 19.7 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BMA | INTS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +27.0% | – |
| 2023 | +91.6% | – |
| 2024 | +277.8% | -79.5% |
| 2025 | -6.2% | -76.7% |
| 2026 | -11.4% | -58.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BMA and INTS good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.31, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BMA and INTS?
The BMA/INTS correlation stands at 0.31 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.61, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is INTS a good diversifier for BMA?
A fair diversifier. At 0.31, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.31 mean?
A reading of 0.31 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bma-vs-ints.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bma-vs-ints/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BMA correlations · INTS correlations
