INTS vs LRN: Correlation
Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) and Stride, Inc. (LRN) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.41.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are INTS and LRN?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of INTS and LRN correlate at -0.41, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.80 versus -0.41 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -3870.1 %².
LRN is close to the least connected end of INTS's tracked universe, ranking #28 of 28. The trailing year gives INTS the advantage: -43.4% versus -49.8%, a 6.4-point spread. Risk is not evenly split, since INTS carries 3.2 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
INTS vs LRN: side by side
| INTS (Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.) | LRN (Stride, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -43.4% | -49.8% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +147.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 173.1% | 54.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.52 | 0.26 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.5% | -64.1% |
| Market cap | – | $3.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 11.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | INTS | LRN |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -6.2% |
| 2023 | – | +89.8% |
| 2024 | -79.5% | +75.1% |
| 2025 | -76.7% | -37.5% |
| 2026 | -58.3% | +31.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are INTS and LRN good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.41 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between INTS and LRN?
The INTS/LRN correlation stands at -0.41 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.80, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is LRN a good diversifier for INTS?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.41 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.41 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.41 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ints-vs-lrn.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ints-vs-lrn/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: INTS correlations · LRN correlations
