INTS vs PUMP: Correlation
Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) and ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.34.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are INTS and PUMP?
Over the past 3 years, INTS and PUMP moved with a correlation of 0.34, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.69) than the 3-year average (0.34). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 3865.6 %².
Within INTS's tracked universe of 28 assets, PUMP comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: PUMP led by 171.6 percentage points, -43.4% for INTS against +128.2% for PUMP. One caveat on sizing: INTS is 2.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
INTS vs PUMP: side by side
| INTS (Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.) | PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -43.4% | +128.2% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +45.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 173.1% | 65.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.52 | 0.73 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.5% | -59.1% |
| Market cap | – | $1.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | INTS | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | +28.0% |
| 2023 | – | -19.2% |
| 2024 | -79.5% | +11.3% |
| 2025 | -76.7% | +1.9% |
| 2026 | -58.3% | +17.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are INTS and PUMP good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.34, INTS and PUMP keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between INTS and PUMP?
The INTS/PUMP correlation stands at 0.34 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.69, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is PUMP a good diversifier for INTS?
Reasonably. At 0.34, INTS and PUMP keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.34 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ints-vs-pump.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ints-vs-pump/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: INTS correlations · PUMP correlations
