INTS vs NRXS: Correlation
Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) and Neuraxis, Inc. (NRXS) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are INTS and NRXS?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of INTS and NRXS correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.36) than the 3-year average (-0.24). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -3472.2 %².
Within INTS's tracked universe of 28 assets, NRXS comes in at #16 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with NRXS ahead by 192.2 points (-43.4% versus +148.8%). Risk is not evenly split, since INTS carries 2.1 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
INTS vs NRXS: side by side
| INTS (Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.) | NRXS (Neuraxis, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -43.4% | +148.8% |
| 5-year return | n/a | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 173.1% | 82.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.52 | 0.96 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.5% | -69.2% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | INTS | NRXS |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -79.5% | -12.0% |
| 2025 | -76.7% | +93.2% |
| 2026 | -58.3% | +32.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are INTS and NRXS good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, INTS and NRXS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between INTS and NRXS?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between INTS and NRXS is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.36 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is NRXS a good diversifier for INTS?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, INTS and NRXS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ints-vs-nrxs.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ints-vs-nrxs/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: INTS correlations · NRXS correlations
