INTS vs LH: Correlation
Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) and Labcorp (LH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.18.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are INTS and LH?
Over the past 3 years, INTS and LH moved with a correlation of -0.18, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.38) than the 3-year average (-0.18). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -664.4 %².
Within INTS's tracked universe of 28 assets, LH comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: LH led by 65.2 percentage points, -43.4% for INTS against +21.8% for LH. One caveat on sizing: INTS is 8.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
INTS vs LH: side by side
| INTS (Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.) | LH (Labcorp) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -43.4% | +21.8% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +36.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 173.1% | 21.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.52 | 0.33 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.5% | -17.4% |
| Market cap | – | $27.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 27.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.86% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Health Care |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | INTS | LH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -24.4% |
| 2023 | – | +13.8% |
| 2024 | -79.5% | +2.2% |
| 2025 | -76.7% | +10.6% |
| 2026 | -58.3% | +34.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are INTS and LH good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, INTS and LH have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between INTS and LH?
The INTS/LH correlation stands at -0.18 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.38, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is LH a good diversifier for INTS?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, INTS and LH have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.18 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ints-vs-lh.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ints-vs-lh/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: INTS correlations · LH correlations
