PairBook
HomeFLO › FLO vs VTVT

FLO vs VTVT: Correlation

Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and vTv Therapeutics Inc. (VTVT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-531.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FLO and VTVT?

Over the past 3 years, FLO and VTVT moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.27 over 1 year against -0.20 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.13, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -531.8 %².

Out of 15 assets tracked against FLO, VTVT lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: VTVT led by 151.7 percentage points, -49.7% for FLO against +102.0% for VTVT. Risk is not evenly split, since VTVT carries 3.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FLO vs VTVT: side by side

FLO (Flowers Foods, Inc.)VTVT (vTv Therapeutics Inc.)
1-year return-49.7%+102.0%
5-year return-63.2%-56.6%
Volatility (ann.)26.8%100.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.200.64
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.8%-61.7%
Market cap$1.5B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)26.8
Dividend yield13.81%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: FLO 13.81% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: VTVT -61.7% vs -68.8%Higher 5y return: VTVT -56.6% vs -63.2%
-50%0%+125%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FLO · VTVT

Year-by-year returns

YearFLOVTVT
2022+8.0%-33.4%
2023-18.6%-56.6%
2024-4.3%+20.1%
2025-43.6%+189.6%
2026-33.0%-18.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FLO and VTVT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, FLO and VTVT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FLO and VTVT?

The FLO/VTVT correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.27, 5 years: -0.13), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VTVT a good diversifier for FLO?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, FLO and VTVT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flo-vs-vtvt.json

FLO vs VTVT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20FLO vs VTVT-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FLO vs VTVT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/flo-vs-vtvt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flo-vs-vtvt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FLO correlations · VTVT correlations