PairBook
HomeFLO › FLO vs GIS

FLO vs GIS: Correlation

How closely do Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and General Mills (GIS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.54, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.54
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.55
long-run
Ann. covariance
294.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FLO and GIS?

Over the past 3 years, FLO and GIS moved with a correlation of 0.54, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.42) than the 3-year average (0.54). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.55, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 294.7 %².

GIS is one of the assets that tracks FLO most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 15 assets we track against FLO. The last year tells two different stories: GIS led by 36.9 percentage points, -49.7% for FLO against -12.8% for GIS.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FLO vs GIS: side by side

FLO (Flowers Foods, Inc.)GIS (General Mills)
1-year return-49.7%-12.8%
5-year return-63.2%-14.6%
Volatility (ann.)26.8%20.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.20-0.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.8%-53.4%
Market cap$1.5B$21.6B
P/E (trailing)26.8
Dividend yield13.81%6.09%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: FLO 13.81% vs 6.09%Smaller drawdown: GIS -53.4% vs -68.8%Higher 5y return: GIS -14.6% vs -63.2%
-50%0%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FLO · GIS

Year-by-year returns

YearFLOGIS
2022+8.0%+28.1%
2023-18.6%-20.0%
2024-4.3%+1.4%
2025-43.6%-23.7%
2026-33.0%-8.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FLO and GIS good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.54 means FLO and GIS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FLO and GIS?

The FLO/GIS correlation stands at 0.54 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.42, 5 years: 0.55), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GIS a good diversifier for FLO?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.54 means FLO and GIS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.54 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flo-vs-gis.json

FLO vs GIS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.54FLO vs GIS0.54

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FLO vs GIS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/flo-vs-gis.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flo-vs-gis/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FLO correlations · GIS correlations