EPC vs FLO: Correlation
Edgewell Personal Care Company (EPC) and Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.47.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are EPC and FLO?
Over the past 3 years, EPC and FLO moved with a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.58 versus 0.47 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.43, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 474.7 %².
Within EPC's tracked universe of 18 assets, FLO comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with EPC ahead by 75.3 points (+25.6% versus -49.7%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
EPC vs FLO: side by side
| EPC (Edgewell Personal Care Company) | FLO (Flowers Foods, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +25.6% | -49.7% |
| 5-year return | -25.7% | -63.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 37.3% | 26.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.41 | 0.20 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -60.1% | -68.8% |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 26.8 |
| Dividend yield | 2.09% | 13.81% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | EPC | FLO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -14.3% | +8.0% |
| 2023 | -3.5% | -18.6% |
| 2024 | -6.8% | -4.3% |
| 2025 | -47.9% | -43.6% |
| 2026 | +70.6% | -33.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are EPC and FLO good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between EPC and FLO?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EPC and FLO is 0.47 over 3 years, 0.58 over 1 year and 0.43 over 5 years.
Is FLO a good diversifier for EPC?
A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.47 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/epc-vs-flo.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/epc-vs-flo/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: EPC correlations · FLO correlations
