PairBook
HomeASBP › ASBP vs FLO

ASBP vs FLO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (ASBP) and Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) carry a correlation of -0.31, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
-14013.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ASBP and FLO?

Over the past 3 years, ASBP and FLO moved with a correlation of -0.31, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.39 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.27, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -14013.2 %².

Within ASBP's tracked universe of 70 assets, FLO comes in at #56 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months FLO came out ahead by 11.6 percentage points (-61.3% against -49.7%). Risk is not evenly split, since ASBP carries 63.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ASBP vs FLO: side by side

ASBP (Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc.)FLO (Flowers Foods, Inc.)
1-year return-61.3%-49.7%
5-year return-97.9%-63.2%
Volatility (ann.)1699.4%26.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.590.20
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-68.8%
Market cap$1.5B
P/E (trailing)26.8
Dividend yield0.00%13.81%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: FLO 13.81% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FLO -68.8% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: FLO -63.2% vs -97.9%
-99%0%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ASBP · FLO

Year-by-year returns

YearASBPFLO
2022+8.0%
2023+5.7%-18.6%
2024+5.6%-4.3%
2025-98.9%-43.6%
2026+56.4%-33.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ASBP and FLO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.31, ASBP and FLO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ASBP and FLO?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.31 over 3 years, with -0.39 over the last year and -0.27 over 5 years.

Is FLO a good diversifier for ASBP?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.31, ASBP and FLO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.31 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/asbp-vs-flo.json

ASBP vs FLO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31ASBP vs FLO-0.31

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ASBP vs FLO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/asbp-vs-flo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/asbp-vs-flo/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ASBP correlations · FLO correlations