PairBook
HomeFLO › FLO vs SMPL

FLO vs SMPL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carry a correlation of 0.38, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.38
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.37
long-run
Ann. covariance
383.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FLO and SMPL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FLO and SMPL correlate at 0.38, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.38) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.37, with an annualized covariance of 383.9 %².

Within FLO's tracked universe of 15 assets, SMPL comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FLO ahead by 15.2 points (-49.7% versus -64.9%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FLO vs SMPL: side by side

FLO (Flowers Foods, Inc.)SMPL (The Simply Good Foods Company)
1-year return-49.7%-64.9%
5-year return-63.2%-71.3%
Volatility (ann.)26.8%37.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.200.38
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.8%-76.2%
Market cap$1.5B$0.9B
P/E (trailing)26.8
Dividend yield13.81%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: FLO 13.81% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FLO -68.8% vs -76.2%Higher 5y return: FLO -63.2% vs -71.3%
-64%0%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FLO · SMPL

Year-by-year returns

YearFLOSMPL
2022+8.0%-8.5%
2023-18.6%+4.1%
2024-4.3%-1.6%
2025-43.6%-48.5%
2026-33.0%-49.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FLO and SMPL good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.38, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FLO and SMPL?

The FLO/SMPL correlation stands at 0.38 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.38, 5 years: 0.37), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SMPL a good diversifier for FLO?

A fair diversifier. At 0.38, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.38 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flo-vs-smpl.json

FLO vs SMPL: 3-year weekly correlation 0.38FLO vs SMPL0.38

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FLO vs SMPL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/flo-vs-smpl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flo-vs-smpl/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FLO correlations · SMPL correlations